To Blank or Not to Blank

Who are we to force our users to interact with our websites a specific way? The traditional logic I’ve always heard various designers / developers /managers / site owners use to justify browser targeting is the notion that, “It keeps the users on the site.” This logic is short-sighted, pretentious, and obsolete.
It’s a Hardware Option Now
If users want a new window open, they know how to do it. Typically it is accomplished by “middle-clicking” (clicking the scroll wheel itself), but there are several other browser-based shortcuts and hotkeys that provide the same function. Users that like to open up several windows (or tabs), and navigate the www in a multi-windowed interface have probably already come up with their own system for doing so.
Can’t Go Back
Users that like to interact online in a single window traditionally use the “Back” button to return to previously viewed pages. Opening a new window for said users disables their browsing history. They can’t go back because there is nowhere to go back to.
Clutters the Taskbar
Most taskebars are already cluttered enough! Now your forcing another new window into the mess? No thanks!
Not that this is the most pressing issue the development community faces, but I think we owe our users a little more credit. Let’s let them decide if they want to “middle-click” or not.
April 4th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Whoa, weird. I wrote about the exact same thing on my blog on the exact same day.
http://noahliebman.com/2008/03/03/on-links-that-open-in-new-windows/